What does it mean to think, create or decide in the age of AI?

Nine leading voices reflect on artificial intelligence – not as an abstract force, but as a tool whose worth depends on how it honours our humanity. 

What does it mean to think, create or decide in the age of AI?

Nine leading voices reflect on artificial intelligence – not as an abstract force, but as a tool whose worth depends on how it honours our humanity. 

Part I

What intelligence means – and who defines it

Before AI is built, trained or deployed, it inherits human ideas, biases and values. What could this mean for its future?

Part I

What intelligence means – and who defines it

Before AI is built, trained or deployed, it inherits human ideas, biases and values. What could this mean for its future?

What does it mean to be human in an age of machines? 

For as long as humans have existed, we’ve been reinventing ourselves through tools: stones and fire, language, literacy. What’s happening now, while new, has deep roots.

The technologies we make are parts of our minds, our societies, ourselves. Outsource counting onto your fingers, memory to paper, arithmetic to a calculator – you’re altering what it means to be human.

Companies prefer grand talk of AI because it’s easier than addressing regulation and messy realities, but every technology has been a lightning rod for anxiety – trains, telephones, typewriters.

Ultimately, it’s muddy and complicated. The best response is to ask better questions and to keep critically engaged with the tools that are, quite literally, parts of ourselves.”

Why does AI feel existential? 

“With every technology, theres something gained and something lost. With AI, we’re only at the beginning of working out what that will be.

AI is an existential technology, which extends our capacities but also changes the way we view ourselves.  

In my own work building large-scale AI systems, the first step is always: what problem are we solving, and how will we measure it?  

With AI, unlike building a bridge or a plane, success criteria aren’t obvious. That makes judgement and the framing of questions absolutely central.

What intelligence have we ignored? 

Technology is never neutral – it arises out of hierarchies and ideologies. 

Even generative AI comes from the earth – it uses the earth. The question is whether technologies interact generatively or extractively – institutions need more space to reflect on this.

I grew up Ghanaian but also in a Western scientific paradigm where intelligence is tightly linked to sociopolitical power.

That tradition separates humans from nature, science from spirituality, reason from emotion. Unlearning means moving closer to these other ways of knowing. I love technology, I studied astrophysics out of awe for space, but there are other types of intelligence – spiritual, cultural, ecological – that are also forward-looking and innovative.”

What does it mean to be human in an age of machines? 

For as long as humans have existed, we’ve been reinventing ourselves through tools: stones and fire, language, literacy. What’s happening now, while new, has deep roots.

The technologies we make are parts of our minds, our societies, ourselves. Outsource counting onto your fingers, memory to paper, arithmetic to a calculator – you’re altering what it means to be human.

“For as long as humans have existed, we’ve been reinventing ourselves through tools.”

Companies prefer grand talk of AI because it’s easier than addressing regulation and messy realities, but every technology has been a lightning rod for anxiety – trains, telephones, typewriters.

Ultimately, it’s muddy and complicated. The best response is to ask better questions and to keep critically engaged with the tools that are, quite literally, parts of ourselves.”

What does it mean to be human in an age of machines? 

With every technology, there’s something gained and something lost. With AI, we’re only at the beginning of working out what that will be. 

AI is an existential technology, which extends our capacities but also changes the way we view ourselves.  

“AI is philosophy on a deadline.”

In my own work building large-scale AI systems, the first step is always: what problem are we solving, and how will we measure it?  

With AI, unlike building a bridge or a plane, success criteria aren’t obvious. That makes judgement and the framing of questions absolutely central.

What intelligence have we ignored? 

Technology is never neutral – it arises out of hierarchies and ideologies. 

Even generative AI comes from the earth – it uses the earth. The question is whether technologies interact generatively or extractively – institutions need more space to reflect on this...

“There are other types of intelligence – spiritual, cultural, ecological.”

I grew up Ghanaian but also in a Western scientific paradigm where intelligence is tightly linked to sociopolitical power.

That tradition separates humans from nature, science from spirituality, reason from emotion. Unlearning means moving closer to these other ways of knowing. I love technology, I studied astrophysics out of awe for space, but there are other types of intelligence – spiritual, cultural, ecological – that are also forward-looking and innovative.”

Before AI becomes a system, a product or a policy, it begins as an idea.

Every model is shaped by human assumptions about what intelligence is, whose knowledge counts, and what kind of future we value.

What follows is how this is starting to play out in practice.  

Part II

AI in Practice 

Who benefits, who decides – and who is accountable when systems fail.  

Who gets access to opportunity?  

“Since we started in 2008, we have reached 300,000 women entrepreneurs in lower and middle-income countries across the world. We support women to build on the skills they already have: leadership, resilience, empathy... 

“AI wasn’t on my horizon when I started the foundation, but I knew even then that digital tools were helping me as a small legal business owner. I thought, if a fortunate woman can benefit from these tools, imagine what could happen if we put them in the hands of women who have capacity, foresight, the urge and resilience to use them to expand and grow.

We conducted a survey of nearly 3,000 women entrepreneurs in low to middle-income countries. We found that almost half of the women surveyed were already aware of AI and what it could mean for their business. However, 20% of the women hadn’t yet heard about AI’s possibilities.

Who is responsible when systems fail? 

“AI transformation is tough and there will be failures and expensive mistakes, so it requires honesty, emotional intelligence and communication.

It all starts with mindset and culture, especially at the top. If the leadership isn’t courageous and committed, nothing else matters.

Responsible AI is not optional. If you treat it like a nice-to-have, you’re holding a ticking time bomb. At Microsoft, we saw many real cases, internal and external, where ethical risks with AI became real problems.

It’s reputational, financial, legal risk – and the public often doesn’t hear about it because of confidentiality or PR suppression. Responsible AI is as essential as cybersecurity.”

What does trust look like at scale? 

“If a person makes a mistake, it’s just a human mistake. If AI does it, it’s front-page news. That’s the cultural challenge around trust. 

But peer experience changes things. A doctor says: “I used this tool and it helped me with a tough case.” Or: “It suggested an option I hadn’t even considered.” And suddenly colleagues pay attention.

In 2020 I was asked to curate Mayo’s 150 years of data to build a multimodal dataset for AI. Since then, we’ve created hundreds of predictive algorithms and several foundation models that do what humans can’t.

My father-in-law died of pancreatic cancer in 2014. It’s usually found too late, invisible on scans. Now Mayo has an AI model that can detect it at stage 0 – two years earlier than a human could.”

Who gets access to opportunity?   

“Since we started in 2008, we have reached 300,000 women entrepreneurs in lower and middle-income countries across the world. We support women to build on the skills they already have: leadership, resilience, empathy.

“If a fortunate woman can benefit from these tools, imagine what could happen if we put them in the hands of women who have capacity, foresight and resilience.”

AI wasn’t on my horizon when I started the foundation, but I knew even then that digital tools were helping me as a small legal business owner. I thought, if a fortunate woman can benefit from these tools, imagine what could happen if we put them in the hands of women who have capacity, foresight, the urge and resilience to use them to expand and grow.

We conducted a survey of nearly 3,000 women entrepreneurs in low to middle-income countries. We found that almost half of the women surveyed were already aware of AI and what it could mean for their business. However, 20% of the women hadn’t yet heard about AI’s possibilities.”

Who is responsible when systems fail?

“AI transformation is tough and there will be failures and expensive mistakes, so it requires honesty, emotional intelligence and communication.

It all starts with mindset and culture, especially at the top. If the leadership isn’t courageous and committed, nothing else matters.

“If the leadership isn’t courageous and committed, nothing else matters.”

Responsible AI is not optional. If you treat it like a nice-to-have, you’re holding a ticking time bomb. At Microsoft, we saw many real cases, internal and external, where ethical risks with AI became real problems.

It’s reputational, financial, legal risk – and the public often doesn’t hear about it because of confidentiality or PR suppression. Responsible AI is as essential as cybersecurity.”

What does trust look like at scale? 

“If a person makes a mistake, it’s just a human mistake. If AI does it, it’s front-page news. That’s the cultural challenge around trust. 

But peer experience changes things. A doctor says: “I used this tool and it helped me with a tough case.” Or: “It suggested an option I hadn’t even considered.” And suddenly colleagues pay attention.

“Anyone can make an algorithm; that’s not the hard part. The real challenge is making it trustworthy, explainable and equitable.”

In 2020 I was asked to curate Mayo’s 150 years of data to build a multimodal dataset for AI. Since then, we’ve created hundreds of predictive algorithms and several foundation models that do what humans can’t.

My father-in-law died of pancreatic cancer in 2014. It’s usually found too late, invisible on scans. Now Mayo has an AI model that can detect it at stage 0 – two years earlier than a human could.”

Once ideas are translated into systems, they meet the real world.

Here, abstract questions about intelligence become concrete decisions about access, responsibility and trust.

But if we get this right, what could the future of our society working in collaboration with AI look like?

Part III

Where could this lead us?

The long-term consequences – and potential – that AI can have in our futures

“Technology is neutral. How you use it is what matters.”

Not everyone can afford a therapist. In Bangalore, with 12 million people, we simply don’t have enough. Technology is the only way to democratise access to wellbeing. 

Our goal is to help people move beyond diagnosis. If you can answer the question, “Who am I?” everything changes. 

We’re working on life event ontology – understanding how different aspects of daily life impact wellbeing. It helps people make meaningful, personalised changes. 

Technology can be alienating, but if it’s used consciously, it can be a bridge to human connection. 

“Everything begins with morality.” 

As humans, we are values-driven. But the question is: how do we give AI a spiritual orientation, like we have? What are we building into AI that creates its core? 

With free trade and climate policy, it was often blue-collar workers who bore the costs. With AI, white-collar jobs are now under threat, which is why it’s receiving more attention. But for us at the Council, the plight of the working class – those left behind by decades of globalisation and widening inequality – has always been central. AI must not repeat those mistakes. 

If companies are reckless with workers, products or reputation, value diminishes. AI touches all of those. Too many bad actors could bring down capitalism itself. 

Innovators won’t slow down. So, the guardrails – built into the race – must be fundamental. 

“Centuries from now, people will look back on the 2020s the way we look at the invention of electricity.” 

AI feels like déjà vu – only bigger. It’s moving faster because it sits on digital infrastructure already built and its impact will go beyond the internet. We’re entering an age where humans work alongside intelligent machines – essentially, a new species of intelligence and that will require redesigning industries, economies and, ultimately, how civilisation works. 

Every knowledge worker will have a high-capacity assistant that makes them two, three, even four times more productive. 

Every student could have a 24/7 tutor that knows their strengths, weaknesses and learning style.

The question isn’t whether companies like OpenAI or Google profit. It’s how everyone else uses these tools to reshape systems.

If we do this right, AI could help create a far better world.

 

“Technology is neutral. How you use it is what matters.” 

Not everyone can afford a therapist. In Bangalore, with 12 million people, we simply don’t have enough. Technology is the only way to democratise access to wellbeing. 

Our goal is to help people move beyond diagnosis. If you can answer the question, “Who am I?” everything changes. 

We’re working on life event ontology – understanding how different aspects of daily life impact wellbeing. It helps people make meaningful, personalised changes. 

Technology can be alienating, but if it’s used consciously, it can be a bridge to human connection. 

“Everything begins with morality.” 

As humans, we are values-driven. But the question is: how do we give AI a spiritual orientation, like we have? What are we building into AI that creates its core? 

With free trade and climate policy, it was often blue-collar workers who bore the costs. With AI, white-collar jobs are now under threat, which is why it’s receiving more attention. But for us at the Council, the plight of the working class – those left behind by decades of globalisation and widening inequality – has always been central. AI must not repeat those mistakes. 

If companies are reckless with workers, products or reputation, value diminishes. AI touches all of those. Too many bad actors could bring down capitalism itself. 

Innovators won’t slow down. So, the guardrails – built into the race – must be fundamental. 

“Centuries from now, people will look back on the 2020s the way we look at the invention of electricity.”

AI feels like déjà vu – only bigger. It’s moving faster because it sits on digital infrastructure already built and its impact will go beyond the internet. We’re entering an age where humans work alongside intelligent machines – essentially, a new species of intelligence and that will require redesigning industries, economies and, ultimately, how civilisation works. 

Every knowledge worker will have a high-capacity assistant that makes them two, three, even four times more productive. 

Every student could have a 24/7 tutor that knows their strengths, weaknesses and learning style. 

The question isn’t whether companies like OpenAI or Google profit. It’s how everyone else uses these tools to reshape systems.

If we do this right, AI could help create a far better world. 

The story of AI is often told as a technological inevitability.

But technology does not arrive with values of its own. It inherits them – from the assumptions we code within it and the futures we imagine worth building. 

Across these conversations, one truth becomes clear: AI is not separate from us.

It reflects how we understand intelligence, power, care and responsibility.

The questions that matter most are not only what machines can do, but what we choose to ask of them – and of ourselves. 

Read the full interviews in The Beautiful Truth magazine. 

The story of AI is often told as a technological inevitability.

But technology does not arrive with values of its own. It inherits them – from the assumptions we code within it and the futures we imagine worth building. 

Across these conversations, one truth becomes clear: AI is not separate from us.

It reflects how we understand intelligence, power, care and responsibility.

The questions that matter most are not only what machines can do, but what we choose to ask of them – and of ourselves. 

Read the full interviews in

The Beautiful Truth magazine